FileMaker vs Quickbase

September 27, 2019
                         

Bottom line: Which one is better?

Bottom line: FileMaker is better.

FileMaker is better in this review of FileMaker vs Quickbase because it has a better pricing plan, is flexible, has larger community developers with different plugins and is fully customizable.

FileMaker vs Quickbase: FEATURES

FileMaker comprises of layouts, templates with summaries, texts and plug-ins that help you to create the database. It involves the use of texts and third-party plug-ins and scripts that allow the user to access the data source. FileMaker also has AES-256-bit file encryption that keeps your information on a server or desktop secure.

Quickbase is a workflow management solution that is aimed at app development and productivity. It offers tools for team collaboration, customization, task automation, reporting and much more. It allows users to build apps by choosing a template, uploading an in-built spreadsheet or customizing everything by starting from scratch to build out tables, forms and records using the point-and-click actions. Some of the basic features of Quickbase include custom reports, custom branding, mobile-ready applications, Role-based dashboards, audit logs, custom passwords and advanced data encryption.

Bottom line: FileMaker is better.

FileMaker vs Quickbase: WORK MANAGEMENT

FileMaker has a GUI-interface that the user can use the drag-and-drop option for easy data management. It allows the user to connect to SQL databases like SQL server and Oracle by simply installing an Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) driver.

It allows users to customize installed apps with their company brand names, logos and colors. In addition, it has reporting and charting tools that help the user summarize reports, graphs, charts as well as dashboards.

Quickbase is a cloud-based solution used to build customized business apps. It has more than 800 customizable pre-built applications a user can choose from. It has a fast performance and supports applications of all sizes with thousands of users around the world.

Quickbase is a straightforward wizard-based app building with a form-based interface for workflow automation with no coding. It offers fast solutions to business users and control as well as security to IT personnel. In addition, it offers role-based access control, customizable home pages, APIs, unlimited dashboards and reports and web forms for quick data collection.

Quickbase allows the user to use pre-built app connectors to seamlessly integrate with other cloud-based solutions like Gmail, Box, Salesforce, NetSuite and the rest.

Bottom line: FileMaker is better.

FileMaker vs Quickbase: COLLABORATION

FileMaker is an app development solution designed to allow users create and deploy apps. Apps can be made on cloud, across mobile and on premise environments with a lot of ease. FileMaker also supports the importation of files from other platforms to enable the teams focus on handling the tasks they are assigned to. Teams also have the freedom of sharing and managing files with other team members and other external collaborators with a lot of ease. In addition, FileMaker is compatible across platforms like iPad, iPhone and Mac and Windows PCs. This allows members to access their colleague’s database from other devices.

Quickbase allow users to create interactive reports. The report builder tool and the drag-and-drop editor allow you to generate customizable reports and report subscriptions and lets you share them easily with other users. It offers a cloud platform where users can collaborate easily. It has more than 700 apps which the user can modify without coding expertise.

Bottom line: FileMaker is better.

FileMaker vs Quickbase: PRICING

The pricing of FileMaker is a bit different as teams and individuals acquire access to the software’s suite of features and services when they purchase a license. The enterprise pricing differ according to the teams who will host the system on their servers as well as a cloud-based system and individuals. Teams (Company server Hosting) starts at $888 for annual subscription for 5 users. Individual plan costs for $329 as a one-time payment (download only) or $349 as a one-time payment (download with CD/DVD).

Quickbase offers 3 pricing plans which allow users to subscribe either monthly or annually. They include Quickbase Premier that costs $25 per month billed annually or $30 per user per month billed monthly. Quickbase Platform plan costs $40 per user per month billed annually or $48 per user per month billed monthly. The Quickbase Enterprise plan has no pricing available but you can get a customized quote.

Bottom line: FileMaker is better.

Conclusion

FileMaker is a better tool in this review as it has a better pricing plan, is flexible, has larger community developers with different plugins and is fully customizable.