MS Access vs FileMaker

February 5, 2021

Inner Navigation

Bottom line: Which one is better?

Bottom line: FileMaker is better.

FileMaker is a better Project management solution when we compare MS Access vs FileMaker that has free features with an easy to use interface and is affordable.

MS Access vs FileMaker: FEATURES

Some of the main features of MS Access include Ribbon interface, search bar, PDF reports, Anchoring, Custom solution building, Web publishing, graphical queries, Wizards and design options amongst others. It is an easy-to-use tool with in-built templates that are customizable. It also has user-friendly forms backed with Visual Basics for Applications (VBA) used to automate business processes. You can use MS Access to contact banks, set reminders, track assets and timelines, create and manage charts and calendars and many more.

FileMaker Pro comprises of layouts, templates with summaries, texts and plug-ins that help you to create the database. It involves the use of texts and third-party plug-ins and scripts that allow the user to access the data source. FileMaker also has AES-256-bit file encryption that keeps your information on a server or desktop secure.

Bottom line: FileMaker is better.

MS Access vs FileMaker: TASK MANAGEMENT

MS Access is a database program that is designed to help users easily enter, track, share and report data. It is suitable for project managers, non-profit organizations, SMEs and teams looking for a platform with applications for creating databases and those without technical knowledge.

MS Access can be used alone or integrated with MS Office apps like PowerPoint, Excel or Word. It has a user-friendly interface for easy navigation and usage. It also features in-built templates which can be customized by the user.

FileMaker on the other hand has a GUI-interface that the user can use the drag-and-drop option for easy data management. It allows the user to connect to SQL databases like SQL server and Oracle by simply installing an Open Database Connectivity (ODBC) driver.

It allows users to customize installed apps with their company brand names, logos and colors. In addition, it has reporting and charting tools that help the user summarize reports, graphs, charts as well as dashboards.

Bottom line: File maker is better.

MS Access vs FileMaker: COLLABORATION

MS Access supports seamless integration as it can be linked with other business apps and several other data sources through the connector library. It has the DB that allows you to store your data to Azure SQL and SQL Service so that the information can be managed easily, acts as a reliable back up and fully secured. The customizable in-built templates also allow the user to change the appearance of the apps. It can also act as a platform where users can contact banks, set reminders, track assets and timelines, create and manage charts and calendars and many more.

FileMaker on the other hand is an app development solution designed to allow users create and deploy apps. Apps can be made on cloud, across mobile and on premise environments with a lot of ease. FileMaker also supports the importation of files from other platforms to enable the teams focus on handling the tasks they are assigned to. Teams also have the freedom of sharing and managing files with other team members and other external collaborators with a lot of ease. In addition, FileMaker is compatible across platforms like iPad, iPhone and Mac and Windows PCs. This allows members to access their colleague’s database from other devices.

Bottom line: FileMaker is better.

MS Access vs FileMaker: PRICING

MS Access offers a free trial and paid plans of Office 365 home at $7.99 per month, office 365 personal for $5.99 per month, Only Microsoft Access at $139.99 and Office Professional for $499.99.

The pricing of FileMaker is a bit different as teams and individuals acquire access to the software’s suite of features and services when they purchase a license. The enterprise pricing differ according to the teams who will host the system on their servers as well as a cloud-based system and individuals. Teams (Company server Hosting) starts at $888 for annual subscription for 5 users. Individual plan costs for $329 as a one-time payment (download only) or $349 as a one-time payment (download with CD/DVD).

Bottom line: MS Access is better.


FileMaker is a better solution in this review as it handles work well as compared to MS Access and can easily be used by non-programmers who are new to database encoding.

Leave A Comment0Replies to “MS Access vs FileMaker”