TargetProcess vs Jira

September 27, 2019
                         

Bottom line: Which one is better?

Bottom line: Jira is better.

Jira is better when we compare Targetprocess vs Jira because it is affordable, is the best in project and issue tracking and is suitable for all business enterprises.

TargetProcess vs Jira: FEATURES

Targetprocess is a project management program that is designed to help the user visualize and manage agile projects and other complex tasks. It has full support for Kanban, scrum, SAFe, NEXUS, SoS or customizable Agile methods as well as other frameworks and approaches. This allows you to minimize clutter and focus on important tasks and processes.

Targetprocess has several features that provide data visualization at every level of the organization. It allows users to automatically prioritize inbound tasks and use visual encoding to flag projects. It has the timeline mode that shows the process of a project over time while letting users to set milestones. It allows the user to manage the product process, manage requirements, track resources, create shared boards and get the transparency required across teams, projects and the entire enterprise.

Jira uses a hybrid Scrumban approach which is basically a combination of Scrum and Kanban do adapt to every user scenario. All your workflows, fields, states and issue types have the defaults which the user can change to his/her preference. JIRA deals predominantly with agile project management with the use of Scrumban to capture data as well as regulatory evidence at every stage of the process. It also unites all historic data in a single, searchable hub as well as providing access to it at any time. This helps team members in the project to carry out all rend of analysis as well as statistical investigations while making final overall report of the progress of the tasks at hand.

Bottom line: Jira is better.

TargetProcess vs Jira: WORK MANAGEMENT

Targetprocess is a cloud-based enterprise visual platform that connects Portfolio, products and teams. It has a big picture and a drill-down dashboard feature and uses a hierarchical structure to organize tasks and subtasks. It is fully customizable and flexible and can adapt to any organization’s structure and company’s management style. It allows users to see the whole work in a centralized point and communicate with team members without email. It also allows you to create custom views to show what is relevant and use graphical and custom reports to focus on trends and foresee overall performance.

Jira is a project management program that is designed for efficiency, continuous releases and customer feedback. It enables users to use the drag-and-drop formula while utilizing Scrum, Kanban and hybrid model or while designing your own workflow. It has several templates that include Kanban, Scrum, Project Management, Bug Tracking and many more.

The Kanban has three columns: “to do,” “in progress” and “done” for a simple task but you can add more columns as you wish which can represent anything you assign it to in the project. The scrum view on the other hand allows you to create issues and you can pick some for “sprints” with each assigned a goal or a deadline.

Jira bases its task around basic elements known as issues which are divided into several types. You will use tasks or bugs as well as stories which represent goals or functions and epics which represent larger stories that are to be subdivided into smaller elements. Subtasks are created inside tasks and can be added by clicking the required icon and then tick them off once you are through with them.

Bottom line: Jira is better.

TargetProcess vs Jira: COLLABORATION

Targetprocess has a standalone service desk application that allows users without licence to submit any kind of requests, search and vote for ideas, add comments and track the status of similar items.

JIRA provides a platform whereby members can share an issue instead of copying a link and send it to another member using another application. It also consists of built-in reports where members stay up-to-date on projects and progress of the same. In addition, JIRA consists of monitoring Activity Streams and Dashboards which provide up-to-date information about everything happening in the project.

Bottom line: Jira is better

TargetProcess vs Jira: PRICING

Targetprocess offers a free trial and a team plan which is free. Paid plans include company plan that costs $20 per user per month and the Enterprise plan is available by quote.

JIRA pricing include $10 per month for projects, $20 per month for development and $20 per month for service desk.

Bottom line: Jira is better.

Conclusion

Jira is better in this review because it is affordable, is the best in project and issue tracking and is suitable for all business enterprises.